MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2169582161 · doi:10.1139/v00-195

Intervalence transfer in a new benzotriazolate bridged ruthenium-iron complex

2001· article· en· W2169582161 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reginaldo C. Rocha, Henrique E. Toma

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRutheniumValence (chemistry)ElectrochemistryAqueous solutionMetalCyclic voltammetryInorganic chemistryPhotochemistryCrystallographyPhysical chemistryElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unsymmetrical dinuclear ruthenium–iron complexes [(NH3)5Ru–bta–Fe(CN)5]n (where bta = benzotriazolate; n = –2, –1, 0) were prepared as solid sodium salts from [RuII(NH3)5(bta)]+ or [RuIII(NH3)5(bta)]2+ and [FeII(CN)5(H2O)]3– and characterized in aqueous solution by means of electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical methods. UV-vis, near-infrared, IR, and cyclic and differential pulse voltammetry data suggest that the related mixed valent species belong to a valence trapped formulation, featuring localized Ru(III) and Fe(II) oxidation states. In spite of the class II categorization in the Robin and Day scheme, this system shows a remarkable metal–metal electronic coupling, as deduced from an intense, low-energy, and very broad intervalence band in the near-IR region. In addition, the mixed valence state displays enhanced stabilization in relation to the isovalent state. The intervalence transfer properties are discussed on the basis of Hush's theory.Key words: ammineruthenium complexes, cyanoiron complexes, mixed valence, intervalence, benzotriazole, benzotriazolate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Chemistry→Same topicMetal complexes synthesis and properties→French-language works237,207→