MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multiple large surface photodynamic therapy sessions with topical methylaminolaevulinate in <i>PTCH</i> heterozygous mice

2005· article· en· W2169732146 on OpenAlexaff
Véronique Caty, Y. Liu, Gilles Viau, Robert Bissonnette

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsInnovaderm (Canada)Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotosensitizerPhotodynamic therapyProtoporphyrin IXBasal cell carcinomaHistopathologyMedicineSkin cancerSignificant differencePathologyDermatologyBasal cellCancerChemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combines the administration of a photosensitizer with its subsequent activation by light of the appropriate wavelength. Methylaminolaevulinate (MAL) is a photosensitizer precursor, transformed by cells into protoporphyrin IX. The PTCH gene plays a central role in the genesis of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The PTCH transgenic mouse develops microscopic BCCs when chronically exposed to ultraviolet (UV) or ionizing radiation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the ability of multiple large surface MAL-PDT to prevent BCC, using the PTCH heterozygous mouse as a model. METHODS: Thirty-five mice were exposed to UV radiation for a total of 20 weeks. Group 1 (20 mice) was exposed only to UV whereas group 2 (15 mice) was exposed to UV and weekly to MAL-PDT. At 28 weeks the mice were killed and the skin of the back processed for standard histopathology. Assessment was blind and any slide showing the presence of BCC was counted as a single BCC. The number of mice in groups 1 and 2 showing BCC were compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Nineteen BCCs in nine mice from group 1 were found, but no BCCs in mice from group 2. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly suberythematous PDT sessions with topical MAL were able to delay the development of microscopic BCCs in PTCH mice chronically exposed to UV radiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207