MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169758235 · doi:10.1109/tec.2007.914352

A Current Control Scheme With an Adaptive Internal Model for Torque Ripple Minimization and Robust Current Regulation in PMSM Drive Systems

2008· article· en· W2169758235 on OpenAlexaff
Yasser Abdel‐Rady I. Mohamed, Ehab F. El‐Saadany

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)RippleLyapunov functionHarmonicsInternal modelAdaptive controlTorqueTorque rippleComputer scienceEngineeringDirect torque controlVoltageInduction motorNonlinear systemPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the problem of uncertainties in practical permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs), and proposes a simple adaptive internal model within the current feedback and reference current generation structure as a solution. Due to the time varying nature and the high-bandwidth property of uncertainties in a practical PMSM drive system, the internal model is simply chosen as the estimated uncertainty function. To provide a high bandwidth estimate of the uncertainty function with high-noise immunity, a simple adaptation law is derived, in the sense of Lyapunov functions, using the nominal current dynamics. The inclusion of the frequency modes of the disturbances to be eliminated (the flux harmonics and voltage disturbances caused by parameter variation) in the stable closed-loop system introduces very high-attenuation at different frequency modes corresponding to uncertainty modes. Therefore, a robust torque ripple minimization and current regulation performances are yielded. To properly tune the proposed scheme, a stability analysis based on a discrete-time Lyapunov function has been used to determine the stability limits of the adaptation gain. Comparative evaluation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme under different operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations148
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207