MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169917303 · doi:10.1177/0017896912440765

Perceived usefulness of learning strategies by children with Tourette syndrome plus, their parents and their teachers

2012· article· en· W2169917303 on OpenAlex
Roger E. Thomas, Alan Carroll, Elizabeth Chomin, Tyler Williamson, Tanya Beran, Luz Palacios‐Derflingher, Neil Drummond

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Education Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsGlenrose Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpellPsychologyClass (philosophy)Mathematics educationMedical educationMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Children with Tourette syndrome and other co-morbidities (abbreviated hereafter to TS+) experience significant learning difficulties. We wished to identify educational strategies that these students, their parents and teachers considered useful. Design: An ‘educational toolkit’ was compiled of 84 strategies identified by teachers of TS+ children. Setting: Children attending the TS+ clinic of a university hospital in Edmonton, Alberta. Method: The educational toolkit was administered to 30 randomly selected TS+ children attending the clinic, their teachers, and their parents. Results: 13 strategies were endorsed by ≥ 50% of the students, 53 by ≥ 50% of parents, and 42 by ≥ 50% of teachers. The 10 strategies students most strongly endorsed were: (1) computers; (2) calculators; (3) spell-checkers; (4) extra time in class; (5) less homework; (6) information from the teacher; (7) feedback on how to improve work; (8) printed assignments; (9) TS+ explained to their teacher; and (10) not being punished or suspended because of TS+ behaviours. The 10 strategies most frequently endorsed by parents were: (1) the student paying attention and being informed; (2) computers; (3) the teacher telling the whole class ‘listen carefully’ when discussing important ideas; (4) providing ideas about organizing work; (5) providing printed assignments; (6) telling students when they are being helpful; (7) encouraging students for good behaviour and signaling incorrect behaviour; (8) checking students understand each idea the teacher presents; (9) outside experts explaining TS+ to the teacher; and (10) exchanging notes with the teacher. The 10 items most strongly endorsed by teachers were: (1) providing information and direction; (2) feedback on how to improve work; (3) checking students wrote down homework assignments; (4) helping students start work assignments; (5) computers; (6) spell-checkers; (7) monitoring time and work; (8) extra time; (9) feedback about the student’s behaviour and advice if misbehaving; and (10) the teacher explaining to the class how students can help students with learning challenges. Conclusions: There is considerable agreement among parents and teachers about how to help children with TS+ with their schoolwork and behaviours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it