MétaCan
Menu
← all works

Next Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor (A New Impactor for Pharmaceutical Inhaler Testing). Part I: Design

2003· article· en· 228 citations· W2169990471 on OpenAlex· 10.1089/089426803769017659

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Full frame distilled prediction

Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

Candidate categories
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categories
none
Domain
Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
Study design
Candidate signal: Bench or experimentalConsensus signal: Bench or experimental
Genre
Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score
0.144
Threshold uncertainty score
0.999
Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated · codex-gemma-dda1882f352a

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.354
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread
0.058 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

A new cascade impactor has been designed specifically for pharmaceutical inhaler testing. This impactor, called the Next Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor (NGI), has seven stages and is intended to operate at any inlet flow rate between 30 and 100 L/min. It spans a cut size (D50) range from 0.54-microm to 11.7-microm aerodynamic diameter at 30 L/min and 0.24 microm to 6.12 microm at 100 L/min. The aerodynamics of the impactor follow established scientific principles, giving confident particle size fractionation behavior over the design flow range. The NGI has several features to enhance its utility for inhaler testing. One such feature is that particles are deposited on collection cups that are held in a tray. This tray is removed from the impactor as a single unit, facilitating quick sample turn-around times if multiple trays are used. For accomplishing drug recovery, the user can add up to approximately 40 mL of an appropriate solvent directly to the cups. Another unique feature is a micro-orifice collector (MOC) that captures in a collection cup extremely small particles normally collected on the final filter in other impactors. The particles captured in the MOC cup can be analyzed in the same manner as the particles collected in the other impactor stage cups. The user-friendly features and the aerodynamic design principles together provide an impactor well suited to the needs of the inhaler testing community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
Journal of Aerosol Medicine
Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
Trudell Medical International (Canada)
Funders
not available
Keywords
Cascade impactorInhalerAerosolParticle sizeParticle (ecology)AerodynamicsRange (aeronautics)Suspension (topology)Materials scienceProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringComposite materialMathematicsGeologyPhysicsMedicineChemical engineeringMeteorology
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes