MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170032136 · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200393

Results of a phase IIa study of VX-809, an investigational CFTR corrector compound, in subjects with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the <i>F508del-CFTR</i> mutation

2011· article· en· W2170032136 on OpenAlexafffund
John P. Clancy, Steven M. Rowe, Frank J. Accurso, Moira L. Aitken, Raouf Amin, Melissa A. Ashlock, Manfred Ballmann, Michael Boyle, Inez Bronsveld, Preston W. Campbell, K. De Boeck, Scott H. Donaldson, Henry L. Dorkin, Jordan Dunitz, Peter R. Durie, Manu Jain, Anissa Leonard, Karen McCoy, Richard B. Moss, Joseph M. Pilewski, Daniel Rosenbluth, Ronald C. Rubenstein, Michael S. Schechter, Martyn C. Botfield, Claudia L. Ordoñez, G Spencer-Green, Laurent Vernillet, Steve Wisseh, Karl Yen, Michael W. Konstan

Bibliographic record

VenueThorax · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesUniversity of Colorado DenverNational Institutes of HealthNational Center for Research ResourcesGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science AllianceVertex PharmaceuticalsUniversity of WashingtonNationwide Children's HospitalUniversity of PittsburghNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesJohns Hopkins UniversityHarvard CatalystCase Western Reserve UniversityWashington University in St. LouisHarvard UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenNorthwestern UniversityCystic Fibrosis Foundation TherapeuticsChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia
KeywordsCystic fibrosisMedicinePlaceboCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorTolerabilityPharmacodynamicsAdverse effectPharmacokineticsSweat testInternal medicineDiscontinuationGastroenterologySweat glandPharmacologyPathologySWEAT

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: VX-809, a cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator, has been shown to increase the cell surface density of functional F508del-CFTR in vitro. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of VX-809 in adult patients with cystic fibrosis (n=89) who were homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation. Subjects were randomised to one of four VX-809 28 day dose groups (25, 50, 100 and 200 mg) or matching placebo. RESULTS: The type and incidence of adverse events were similar among VX-809- and placebo-treated subjects. Respiratory events were the most commonly reported and led to discontinuation by one subject in each active treatment arm. Pharmacokinetic data supported a once-daily oral dosing regimen. Pharmacodynamic data suggested that VX-809 improved CFTR function in at least one organ (sweat gland). VX-809 reduced elevated sweat chloride values in a dose-dependent manner (p=0.0013) that was statistically significant in the 100 and 200 mg dose groups. There was no statistically significant improvement in CFTR function in the nasal epithelium as measured by nasal potential difference, nor were there statistically significant changes in lung function or patient-reported outcomes. No maturation of immature F508del-CFTR was detected in the subgroup that provided rectal biopsy specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, VX-809 had a similar adverse event profile to placebo for 28 days in F508del-CFTR homozygous patients, and demonstrated biological activity with positive impact on CFTR function in the sweat gland. Additional data are needed to determine how improvements detected in CFTR function secondary to VX-809 in the sweat gland relate to those measurable in the respiratory tract and to long-term measures of clinical benefit. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00865904.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations496
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThoraxSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207