Correlates of sexual activity and inconsistent condom use among high-school girls in Dominica.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with sexual activity and inconsistent condom use among high-school girls in Dominica. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at five high-schools in Dominica in 2000 to assess behaviour that may put high-school girls at risk for HIV The main outcome variable, sexual activity, was defined as vaginal or anal sex, and inconsistent condom use defined as none to infrequent condom use. The convenience sample consisted of 204 girls (median age 16 years). RESULTS: Forty-one per cent (41%) of girls reporting at least one episode of sexual activity. Sexual intercourse was associated with past sexual coercion (OR = 7.2, 95% CI 2.4, 21.8), oral sex (OR = 8.0, 95% CI 3.0, 21.0) and smoking marijuana (OR = 8.2, 95% CI 2.9, 23.0). Among sexually active girls, 59% were inconsistent condom users. Variables associated with inconsistent condom use were being coerced (OR 2.8, 95% CI 0.9, 8.2) and low socio-economic status (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.1, 9.6). CONCLUSION: Sexual activity and inconsistent condom use occur frequently among high-school girls in Dominica. Therefore, strategies directed at delaying the onset of sexual activities such as providing accurate and age-appropriate information on sexuality in the context of the economic and social conditions of their daily lives, and increasing condom use are important in HIV prevention in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".