A time space division multiple access (TSDMA) protocol for multihop wireless networks with access points
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose time division multiple access with circular reservation (TDMA/CR), a time/space division multiple access (TSDMA)-based medium access control (MAC) protocol for wireless mobile networks with control units, including wireless LANs, cellular networks with ad hoc relaying capability, and ad hoc networks with access points or clusterheads. Different from the MAC protocol of IEEE 802.11, TDMA/CR is centralized and can utilize the computation capability of base stations or access points to increase network throughput, reduce latency, and provide QoS guarantees. We evaluate the performance of TDMA/CR and show that the utilization achievable by the wireless-tree (or splitting) channel access mechanisms of TDMA/CR is about 40% to 46% and the channel access delay is small and bounded. Moreover, TDMA/CR can achieve considerably higher throughput (e.g., by a factor of about 3 or higher) due to its support for variable-radius transmissions in ad hoc wireless networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".