Scaffold-Guided Subchondral Bone Repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microfracture and drilling elicit a cartilage repair whose quality depends on subchondral bone repair. Alternatively activated (AA) macrophages express arginase-1, release angiogenic factors, and could be potential mediators of trabecular bone repair. HYPOTHESIS: Chitosan-glycerol phosphate (GP)/blood implants elicit arginase-1+ macrophages in vivo through neutrophil-dependent mechanisms and improve trabecular bone repair of drilled defects compared with drilling alone. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Bilateral trochlear cartilage defects were created in 15 rabbits, microdrilled, and treated or not with chitosan-GP/blood implant to analyze AA macrophages, CD-31+ blood vessels, bone, and cartilage repair after 1, 2, or 8 weeks. Neutrophil and macrophage chemotaxis to rabbit subcutaneous implants of autologous blood and chitosan-GP (+/-blood) was quantified at 1 or 7 days. In vitro, sera from human chitosan-GP/blood and whole blood clots cultured at 37 degrees C were analyzed by proteomics and neutrophil chemotaxis assays. RESULTS: Chitosan-GP/blood clots and whole blood clots released a similar profile of chemotactic factors (PDGF-BB, IL-8/CXCL8, MCP-1/CCL2, and no IL-1beta or IL-6), although chitosan clot sera attracted more neutrophils in vitro. Subcutaneous chitosan-GP (+/-blood) implants attracted more neutrophils (P < .001) and AA macrophages than whole blood clots in vivo. In repairing subchondral drill holes, chitosan-GP/blood implant attracted more AA macrophages at 1 and 2 weeks and more blood vessels at 2 weeks compared with drilled controls. Treatment elicited a more complete woven bone repair at 8 weeks than controls (P = .0011) with a more uniform, integrated collagen type II+ cartilage repair tissue. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: AA macrophages may play a role in the regeneration of subchondral bone, and chitosan-GP can attract and transiently accumulate these cells in the repair tissue. The resulting improved subchondral repair could be advantageous toward enhancing integration of a restored chondral surface to the subchondral bone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".