MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170205088 · doi:10.1109/epec.2010.5697197

An adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy (NF) PI controller for HVDC system

2010· article· en· W2170205088 on OpenAlexaff
Munish Multani, Vijay K. Sood, Jing Ren

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Cerebellar model articulation controllerPID controllerComputer scienceFuzzy logicOpen-loop controllerArtificial neural networkControl engineeringNeuro-fuzzyFuzzy control systemEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceTemperature control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although Fuzzy Logic (FL) controllers for HVDC systems have been previously explored, the optimization of these controllers is still part of active research. In this paper, a 4-layer Neuro-Fuzzy (NF) controller to tune the Fuzzy Rule Base is presented. FL-based PI controllers require gains values as further gains are updated around these values. The proposed controller adds intelligence to the controller as it has the capability of finding out the PI gains with changing system conditions. Gaussian and Triangular membership functions (MFs), corresponding to Radial Basis Functions (RBF) and Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller (CMAC) neural network architecture respectively, have been used to see which one offers a better performance. Results from simulations illustrate the potential of the proposed control scheme as the NF controller successfully adapts to different system conditions and is able to minimize the total current error. Furthermore, a performance comparison with a conventional PI controller is also made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207