MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transport of bacteria on sloping soil surfaces by runoff

2000· article· en· W2170285787 on OpenAlexaff
Jamal Abu-Ashour, Hung Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Toxicology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFecal contamination and water quality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface runoffLoamEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)ManureSoil waterSoil scienceAgronomyEcologyGeologyBiologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pathogenic bacteria exist at soil surfaces as a result of practices as spreading of liquid manure on agricultural lands or use of treated wastewater for irrigation. Rainfall is a major factor affecting vertical and horizontal movement of bacteria in soil. Surface runoff carries bacteria significant distances downstream causing serious threats to ground and surface waters. This study uses a nalidixic acid-resistant Escherichia coli strain as a biotracer monitoring extent of bacterial migration on sloping soil surfaces by runoff action. Two 10×10-m plots in two sites having different slopes were sprayed with water containing biotracer. Soil texture at sites was clay loam. Sixteen days after spraying, two heavy rainfalls that caused runoffs were recorded. First rainfall occurred 2 days after spraying plots. Samples were collected from soil and runoff at different distances downstream of the plots. Biotracer was found in soil and runoff samples some 20 m downstream from center point of plot having the milder slope. Biotracer was found in soil and runoff samples further downstream of the second plot with the steeper slope reaching a 35- and 30-m distance respectively. Most soil and runoff samples collected after the second rainfall, occurring 15 days after inoculation, contained no biotracer except small numbers found in soil samples taken from center point of each plot 5 m downstream. Results confirm the important role of runoff in bacterial transport on soil surfaces. They show E. coli survives in semiarid areas for a long time and increases potential of contamination. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Environ Toxicol 15: 149–153, 2000

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ToxicologySame topicFecal contamination and water qualityFrench-language works237,207