Modifications and deletions of helices within the hairpin ribozyme–substrate complex: An active ribozyme lacking helix 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within the hairpin ribozyme, structural elements required for formation of the active tertiary structure are localized in two independently folding domains, each consisting of an internal loop flanked by helical elements. Here, we present results of a systematic examination of the relationship between the structure of the helical elements and the ability of the RNA to form the catalytically active tertiary structure. Deletions and mutational analyses indicate that helix 1 (H1) in domain A can be entirely eliminated, while segments of helices 2, 3, and 4 can also be deleted. From these results, we derive a new active minimal ribozyme that contains three helical elements, an internal loop, and a terminal loop. A three-dimensional model of this truncated ribozyme was generated using MC-SYM, and confirms that the catalytic core of the minimized construct can adopt a tertiary structure that is very similar to that of the nontruncated version. A new strategy is described to study the functional importance of various residues and chemical groups and to identify specific interdomain interactions. This approach uses two physically separated and truncated domains derived from the minimal motif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".