MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170362795 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3702.1.7

DNA barcoding confirms the presence of Hydria cervinalis (Scopoli, 1763) in the Iberian Peninsula (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Larentiinae)

2013· letter· en· W2170362795 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R. M. Rubio, Juan José Guerrero, M. Garre, A. S. Ortiz

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Genomics InstituteGenome Canada
KeywordsPeninsulaGenusBiologyDNA barcodingZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genus Hydria Hübner, 1822 is distributed across the Palearctic and Nearctic regions, and includes more than 50 species in South America. In Europe, this genus includes five species subdivided into three species-groups, the undulata, the cervinalis and the montivagata species group (Hausmann & Viidalepp 2012). Of these five species, three have been reported from the Iberian Peninsula, Hydria undulata (Linnaeus 1758), H. gudarica (Dufay 1983), and H. montivagata andalusica (Ribbe 1912) (Redondo et al. 2009; Hausmann & Viidalepp 2012). Hydria cervinalis (Scopoli, 1763) is widely distributed from England to western European Russia to the east and from southern Fennoscandia, to the Alps and Carpathians Mountains in the south. This distribution matches a Euro-Caucasian pattern (Hausmann & Viidalepp 2012). H. cervinalis was cited from Eastern Pyrenees (Mazel & Peslier 1997), in the southern Iberian System based on one female from Uña (Cuenca) (Dominguez 1991, unpublished) and from Albarracin (Teruel) (Zerny 1927). However, according to Redondo et al. (2009), all these records must be referred to H. gudarica. Recently, H. cervinalis has been cited by Hausmann and Viidalepp (2012) in the Iberian Peninsula based on our data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207