MRI Measurement of Regional Lung Deposition in Mice Exposed Nose-Only to Nebulized Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles show potential in magnetic targeting of inhaled aerosols to localized sites within the lung. These particles are also used as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the present work, we examine the feasibility of measuring regional lung deposition of iron oxide nanoparticles using MRI. Mice were exposed nose-only to nebulized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. The droplet size distribution in the inhalation chamber was measured using a time-of-flight device. Regional concentrations of iron in the left and right lung were assessed with MRI by measuring the longitudinal relaxation times (T(1)) of the lung tissue in exposed mice, compared to a baseline group. Regional concentrations of iron in the lungs of the mice ranged from 1.1 +/- 0.8 microg/cm(3) (mean +/- one standard deviation, n = 6) in peripheral lung regions to 2.7 +/- 1.4 microg/cm(3) in the central lung, with no significant difference between the left and right lung. The nebulized droplets in the inhalation chamber had mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 5.6 +/- 0.8 microm, with a geometric standard deviation (GSD) of 1.30 +/- 0.03 (both values expressed as mean +/- one standard deviation, n = 6). MRI shows promise for in vivo measurement of regional lung concentrations of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, and may be useful in studies of lung deposition and clearance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it