Detection, Localization, and Sex Classification of Faces from Arbitrary Viewpoints and under Occlusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel framework for detecting, localizing, and classifying faces in terms of visual traits, e.g., sex or age, from arbitrary viewpoints and in the presence of occlusion. All three tasks are embedded in a general viewpoint-invariant model of object class appearance derived from local scale-invariant features, where features are probabilistically quantified in terms of their occurrence, appearance, geometry, and association with visual traits of interest. An appearance model is first learned for the object class, after which a Bayesian classifier is trained to identify the model features indicative of visual traits. The framework can be applied in realistic scenarios in the presence of viewpoint changes and partial occlusion, unlike other techniques assuming data that are single viewpoint, upright, prealigned, and cropped from background distraction. Experimentation establishes the first result for sex classification from arbitrary viewpoints, an equal error rate of 16.3 percent, based on the color FERET database. The method is also shown to work robustly on faces in cluttered imagery from the CMU profile database. A comparison with the geometry-free bag-of-words model shows that geometrical information provided by our framework improves classification. A comparison with support vector machines demonstrates that Bayesian classification results in superior performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".