Cardiac function is not significantly diminished in hearts isolated from young caveolin-1 knockout mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are known to degrade components of the extracellular matrix. More recently, in myocardial oxidative stress injury including ischemia-reperfusion, MMP-2 is activated and degrades troponin I and α-actinin. MMP activity is regulated at several levels. We recently showed that MMP-2 is localized in the caveolae of cardiomyocytes and is negatively regulated by caveolin-1 (Cav-1). The caveolin scaffolding domain of Cav-1 inhibits MMP-2 proteolytic activity in vitro, and Cav-1(-/-) mouse hearts have increased MMP-2 activity compared with controls. Whether this increase in MMP-2 activity translates to impaired cardiac function is unknown. Hearts isolated from Cav-1(-/-) mice and their wild-type controls were perfused as isolated working hearts and physiologically challenged with increasing increments of left atrial preload (7-22.5 mmHg). The hearts were then pharmacologically challenged with increasing concentrations of isoproterenol (0.1-100 nM). Functionally, the Cav-1(-/-) hearts were similar to the controls in heart rate, peak systolic pressure, developed pressure, and rate pressure product. At higher preload pressures, the Cav-1(-/-) hearts outperformed the control hearts. Coronary flow was significantly higher in Cav-1(-/-) hearts under all conditions. The highest concentration of isoproternol increased the heart rate of Cav-1(-/-) hearts more than in controls. Western blot analysis revealed no significant changes in troponin I or α-actinin between Cav-1(-/-) hearts and their controls. There was a significant loss of MMP-2 from both knockout and control hearts during the perfusion. In summary, despite the loss of Cav-1, Cav-1(-/-) hearts show similar or better cardiac function compared with wild-type hearts following physiological challenge or β-adrenergic stimulation in vitro, and this appears unrelated to changes in MMP-2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".