Overexpression of human β<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptors increases gain of excitation-contraction coupling in mouse ventricular myocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated cardiac excitation-contraction coupling at 37 degrees C in transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of human beta2-adrenergic receptors (TG4 mice). In field-stimulated myocytes, contraction was significantly greater in TG4 compared with wild-type (WT) ventricular myocytes. In contrast, when duration of depolarization was controlled with rectangular voltage clamp steps, contraction amplitudes initiated by test steps were the same in WT and TG4 myocytes. When cells were voltage clamped with action potentials simulating TG4 and WT action potential configurations, contractions were greater with long TG4 action potentials and smaller with shorter WT action potentials, which suggests an important role for action potential configuration. Interestingly, peak amplitude of L-type Ca2+ current (I(Ca-L)) initiated by rectangular test steps was reduced, although the voltage dependencies of contractions and currents were not altered. To explore the basis for the altered relation between contraction and I(Ca-L), Ca2+ concentrations were measured in myocytes loaded with fura 2. Diastolic concentrations of free Ca2+ and amplitudes of Ca2+ transients were similar in voltage-clamped myocytes from WT and TG4 mice. However, sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ content assessed with the rapid application of caffeine was elevated in TG4 cells. Increased SR Ca2+ was accompanied by increased frequency and amplitudes of spontaneous Ca2+ sparks measured at 37 degrees C with fluo 3. These observations suggest that the gain of Ca(2+)-induced Ca2+ release is increased in TG4 myocytes. Increased gain counteracts the effects of decreased amplitude of I(Ca-L) in voltage-clamped myocytes and likely contributes to increased contraction amplitudes in field-stimulated TG4 myocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".