C-Terminal Truncation of Cardiac Troponin I Causes Divergent Effects on ATPase and Force
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myocardial stunning is a form of reversible myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury associated with systolic and diastolic contractile dysfunction. In the isolated rat heart model, myocardial stunning is characterized by specific C-terminal proteolysis of the myofilament protein, troponin I (cTnI) that yields cTnI1-193. To determine the effect of this particular C-terminal truncation of cTnI, without the confounding factor of other stunning-induced protein modifications, a series of solution biochemical assays has been undertaken using the human homologue of mouse/rat cTnI1-193, cTnI1-192. Affinity chromatography and actin sedimentation experiments detected little, or no, difference between the binding of cTnI (cTnI1-209) and cTnI1-192 to actin-tropomyosin, troponin T, or troponin C. Both cTnI and cTnI1-192 inhibit the actin-tropomyosin-activated ATPase activity of myosin subfragment 1 (S1), and this inhibition is released by troponin C in the presence of Ca2+. However, cTnI1-192, when reconstituted as part of the troponin complex (cTn1-192), caused a 54+/-11% increase in the maximum Ca2+-activated actin-tropomyosin-S1 ATPase activity, compared with troponin reconstituted with cTnI (cTn). Furthermore, cTn1-192 increased Ca2+ sensitivity of both the actin-tropomyosin-activated S1 ATPase activity and the Ca2+-dependent sliding velocity of reconstituted thin filaments, in an in vitro motility assay, compared with cTn. In an in vitro force assay, the actin-tropomyosin filaments bearing cTn1-192 developed only 76+/-4% (P<0.001) of the force obtained with filaments composed of reconstituted cTn. We suggest that cTnI proteolysis may contribute to the pathophysiology of myocardial stunning by altering the Ca2+-sensing and chemomechanical properties of the myofilaments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".