Organization of microtubules in developing pea root nodule cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pisum sativum L. (pea) root nodule cells undergo many cellular changes in response to infection by Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae. These include cell growth, organelle reorganization, and changes relating to the increase in the number of bacteria within the cell. The objective of this study was to characterize microtubule organization during nodule cell development. The organization of microtubules was examined in developing pea root nodules using fluorescence and electron microscopy techniques. Immunolabelling of microtubules in meristematic cells showed diffuse fluorescence in the cell cortex and adjacent to the nuclear envelope. Recently infected cells contained randomly oriented cortical microtubules and cytoplasmic microtubules that were fragmented with diffuse fluorescence. Infected cells contained an extensive network of long, randomly arranged cortical microtubules with some parallel bundles. Cytoplasmic microtubules in single optical sections of infected cells appeared as short undulating filaments; however, overlapping images from a Z-series of an infected cell showed that the microtubules are long and wavy, and generally radiate inward from the cell cortex.Key words: nodule, microtubules, Rhizobium, pea, symbiosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".