Les coopératives de travail en milieu urbain au Québec: quelques perspectives de développement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2 Cre ¨e¨en 1981, le RQCCT a d'abord existe¨comme Comite¨Provincial des coope¨ratives de travail.Suite a© la cre¨ation en 1985 de la Fe¨de¨ration que¨be¨coise des coope¨ratives de travail (FQCT), cre¨ation a© laquelle il a contribue¨, lui con¢ant le mandat de regrouper et repre¨senter les coope¨ratives de travail (CT), le RQCCT s'est oriente¨vers la promotion de la coope¨ration du travail a© travers la formation des coope¨rateurs et coope¨ratrices du travail, et l'accompagnement de groupes porteurs de projets de CT.Il est base¨a© Montre¨al, mais son rayonnement s'exerce dans tout le Que¨bec.Ses principaux modes d' intervention sont la sensibilisation et l'e¨ducation, l'encadrement et le soutien de projets de coope¨ratives (jeunesse et adultes), et la concertation entre les groupes porteurs de projets coope¨ratifs et leur communaute¨locale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".