MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170689018 · doi:10.1111/cge.12311

A recurrent mutation in <i><scp>DEPDC5</scp></i> predisposes to focal epilepsies in the French‐Canadian population

2013· article· en· W2170689018 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Caroline P. Martin, Catherine Meloche, Marie France Rioux, Dang Khoa Nguyen, Lionel Carmant, E. Andermann, Micheline Gravel, Patrick Cossette

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Genetics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversité de SherbrookeCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéGenome Canada
KeywordsEpilepsyMutationGenotypingPopulationGeneticsEpilepsy syndromesAlleleAllele frequencyBiologyBioinformaticsMedicineGeneNeuroscienceGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Familial focal epilepsy with variable foci (FFEVF) is a heterogeneous epilepsy syndrome originally described in the French-Canadian (FC) population. Mutations in DEPDC5 have recently been identified in multiple cases of FFEVF as well as in a wide spectrum of other familial focal epilepsies. In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency of mutation of this gene in our large cohort of FC individuals with FFEVF, as well as familial and sporadic cases with focal epilepsy. We report a recurrent p.R843X protein-truncating mutation segregating in one large FFEVF and two small focal epilepsy FC families. Fine genotyping suggests an ancestral allele. A new p.T864M variant, predicted to be disease-causing, was also identified in a small FC family. Overall, we identified DEPDC5 mutations in 5% of our familial and sporadic focal epilepsy cases (4/79). Our results support the view that mutations in the DEPDC5 gene are an important cause of autosomal dominant focal epilepsies in the FC population, including a founder mutation that is specific to this population. These findings may facilitate molecular diagnosis in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical GeneticsSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207