MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170799343 · doi:10.1177/2150135110381392

Transposition of the Great Arteries

2010· article· en· W2170799343 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Marshall L. Jacobs, Constantine Mavroudis, Paul J. Chai, Christo I. Tchervenkov, François Lacour-Gayet, Henry L. Walters, James A. Quintessenza

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGreat arteriesCardiologyAortic archSurgeryVentricular outflow tract obstructionInternal medicineTransposition (logic)Cardiac surgeryInterrupted aortic archHeart septal defectAortaHeart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database contains data about 3258 patients with the diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries (TGA) who underwent surgery during the 4-year time interval from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2009, inclusive. This cohort includes 2918 patients with concordant atrioventricular connections and discordant ventriculoarterial connections and 341 patients with congenitally corrected TGA (discordant atrioventricular connections and discordant ventriculoarterial connections). The 4 most common operations were the following: (1) arterial switch operation (ASO) for TGA with intact ventricular septum (n = 1196), (2) ASO with ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair for TGA with VSD (n = 420), (3) ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair for TGA with VSD and hypoplastic arch (n = 55), and (4) Rastelli operation for TGA with VSD and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (n = 49). Detailed preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were obtained about patients who underwent these 4 operations. Median age at surgery (days) was as follows: ASO: 6.0; ASO with VSD repair: 7.0; ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair: 7.0; and Rastelli: 309.0. Mean age at surgery (days) was as follows: ASO: 22.9; ASO with VSD repair: 24.8; ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair: 14.4; and Rastelli: 721.8. Discharge mortality was as follows: ASO: 2.2%; ASO with VSD repair: 5.5%; ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair: 7.3%; and Rastelli: 0%. Median length of stay (days) was as follows: ASO: 11.0; ASO with VSD repair: 11.0; ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair: 18.0; and Rastelli: 7.0. The sternum was left open in the following: ASO: 24.8%; ASO with VSD repair: 29.5%; ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair: 40.0%; and Rastelli: 6.1%. This review of data from the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database allows for unique documentation of patterns of practice and outcomes. From this review, we learned that although surgery for TGA is often complex and may be associated with morbidity, most patients survive without major complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart SurgerySame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207