MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170813188 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2013.265405

Effects of natriuretic peptides on electrical conduction in the sinoatrial node and atrial myocardium of the heart

2013· article· en· W2170813188 on OpenAlexafffund
John Azer, Rui Hua, Pooja S. Krishnaswamy, Robert A. Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDalhousie UniversityDalhousie Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsInternal medicineNatriuretic peptideSinoatrial nodeNPR1Atrial natriuretic peptideNPR2CardiologyReceptorEndocrinologyBasal (medicine)MedicineHeart failureChemistryHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key points Natriuretic peptides are powerful regulators of the cardiovascular system, but their direct electrophysiological effects in the heart are poorly understood. We have used optical mapping techniques to determine the effects of B‐type and C‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP and CNP) as well as their receptors (NPR‐A, NPR‐B and NPR‐C) on electrical conduction in the sinoatrial node and atrial myocardium. In basal conditions, BNP and CNP speed conduction within the sinoatrial node (SAN) and into the atrial myocardium in association with shifts in the initial exit site by activating NPR‐A and NPR‐B. In the presence of isoproterenol, BNP and CNP have the opposite effect whereby conduction in the SAN and atria is slowed. These inhibitory effects are due to the activation of NPR‐C as well as NPR‐A/B. We conclude that natriuretic peptides have potent effects on electrical conduction in the heart. These effects are complex and can involve multiple natriuretic peptide receptors. Abstract Natriuretic peptides, including B‐type and C‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP and CNP), are powerful regulators of the cardiovascular system; however, their electrophysiological effects in the heart, particularly in the sinoatrial node (SAN), are incompletely understood. We have used high‐resolution optical mapping to measure the effects of BNP and CNP, and the roles of natriuretic peptide receptors (NPR‐A, NPR‐B and NPR‐C), on electrical conduction within the SAN and atrial myocardium. In basal conditions BNP and CNP (50–500 nm) increased conduction velocity (CV) within the SAN by ∼30% at the high dose and shifted the initial exit site superiorly. These effects sped conduction from the SAN to the surrounding atrial myocardium and were mediated by the NPR‐A and NPR‐B receptors. In the presence of isoproterenol (1 μm) the NPR‐C receptor made a major contribution to the effects of BNP and CNP in the heart. In these conditions BNP, CNP and the NPR‐C agonist cANF each decreased SAN CV and shifted the initial exit site inferiorly. The effects of cANF (30% reduction) were larger than BNP or CNP (∼15% reduction), indicating that BNP and CNP activate multiple natriuretic peptide receptors. In support of this, the inhibitory effects of BNP were absent in NPR‐C knockout mice, where BNP instead elicited a further increase (∼25%) in CV. Measurements in externally paced atrial preparations demonstrate that the effects of natriuretic peptides on CV are partially independent of changes in cycle length. These data provide detailed novel insight into the complex effects of natriuretic peptides and their receptors on electrical conduction in the heart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207