MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170838597 · doi:10.1086/506616

A Multicenter Observational Study of the Potential Benefits of Initiating Combination Antiretroviral Therapy during Acute HIV Infection

2006· article· en· W2170838597 on OpenAlexaff
Frederick Hecht, Lei Wang, Ann C. Collier, Susan J. Little, Martin Markowitz, Joseph B. Margolick, J Michael Kilby, Eric S. Daar, Brian Conway, Sarah Holte

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsMedicineDiscontinuationSeroconversionInternal medicineViral loadConfidence intervalCohort studyCohortSidaObservational studyAntiretroviral therapyImmunologyViral diseaseGastroenterologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Uncontrolled studies have suggested a benefit, after treatment discontinuation, of initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) during primary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. We assessed whether initiation of HAART within 2 weeks of (acute treatment) or between 2 weeks and 6 months after (early treatment) HIV seroconversion was associated with improvements in the viral load and the CD4+ T cell count after discontinuation of treatment in an observational cohort. METHODS: Subjects from the multicenter Acute Infection and Early Disease Research Program cohort were enrolled in the present study within 6 months of HIV seroconversion and self-selected whether to initiate HAART. Subjects who received acute (n=13) or early (n=45) treatment received HAART for at least 12 weeks and then subsequently stopped treatment, whereas untreated subjects (n=337) declined treatment. HIV RNA levels and CD4+ T cell counts at 24, 48, and 72 weeks after treatment cessation in the 2 treatment groups were compared with those noted in the untreated group during the same periods of observation after enrollment. RESULTS: The acute treatment group had lower mean HIV RNA levels at 24 weeks without therapy (-0.48 log(10) copies/mL [95% confidence interval {CI}, -0.82 to -0.13 log(10) copies/mL]) and higher mean CD4+ T cell counts (112 cells/ mu L [95% CI, 20-205 cells/ microL]), compared with the untreated group at 24 weeks. The differences in the laboratory values for the acute treatment group versus the untreated group at 72 weeks without therapy were as follows: for the HIV RNA level, -0.35 log(10) copies/mL (95% CI, -0.91 to 0.21 log(10) copies/mL) and, for the CD4 T+ cell count, 112 cells/ microL (95% CI, -15 to 213 cells/ microL). The early treatment group had lower HIV RNA levels at 24 weeks than did the untreated group, but differences were no longer apparent by week 48; CD4+ T cell counts were higher in the early treatment group at week 24 (116 cells/ microL [95% CI, 75-157 cells/ microL]) and week 72 (70 cells/ microL [95% CI, 2-138 cells/ microL]). CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of HAART within 2 weeks of antibody seroconversion was associated with viral load and CD4+ T cell count benefits for 24 weeks after termination of HAART, with there being trends toward a longer-term benefit. Later initiation of HAART was associated with a persistent but decreasing CD4+ T cell count benefit and a loss of the viral load benefit by week 72 after discontinuation of treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations172
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207