MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170853624 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00802.2002

Calcium sparks in mouse ventricular myocytes at physiological temperature

2003· article· en· W2170853624 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory R. Ferrier, Robin H. Smith, Susan E. Howlett

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRyanodine receptorEndoplasmic reticulumSPARK (programming language)CalciumChemistryMyocyteStimulationAmplitudeInternal medicineBiophysicsDiastoleEndocrinologyMedicineBiologyPhysicsBiochemistryBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cardiac muscle, Ca2+ is released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) in units called Ca2+ sparks. Ca2+ spark characteristics have been studied almost entirely at room temperature. This study compares characteristics of spontaneous sparks detected with fluo 3 in resting mouse ventricular myocytes at 22 and 37 degrees C. The incidence and frequency of Ca2+ sparks decreased dramatically at 37 degrees C compared with 22 degrees C. Also, spark amplitudes and times to peak were significantly reduced at 37 degrees C. In contrast, spatial width and decay times were unchanged. During field stimulation, peak spatially averaged transients were similar at 22 and 37 degrees C, and experiments with fura 2 demonstrated that diastolic and systolic Ca2+ concentrations were unchanged. However, SR Ca2+ content decreased significantly at 37 degrees C. Restoration of SR Ca2+ by superfusion with 5 mM Ca2+ increased spark frequency but did not reverse the effects of temperature on spark parameters. Thus effects of temperature on spark frequency may reflect changes in SR stores, whereas changes in spark amplitude and rise time may reflect known effects of temperature on ryanodine receptor function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207