MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170924562 · doi:10.1121/1.4934517

Efficient localization and spectral estimation of an unknown number of ocean acoustic sources using a graphics processing unit

2015· article· en· W2170924562 on OpenAlexafffund
Stan E. Dosso, Jan Dettmer, Michael J. Wilmut

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceGraphics processing unitCurse of dimensionalitySimulated annealingInversion (geology)Bayesian probabilityAlgorithmRendering (computer graphics)Artificial intelligenceGeologyParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops a matched-field approach to localization and spectral estimation of an unknown number of ocean acoustic sources employing massively parallel implementation on a graphics processing unit (GPU) for real-time efficiency. A Bayesian formulation is developed in which the locations and complex spectra of multiple sources and noise variances are considered unknown random variables, and the Bayesian information criterion is minimized to estimate these parameters, as well as the number of sources present. Optimization is carried out using simulated annealing and includes steps that attempt to add/delete sources to/from the model. Closed-form maximum-likelihood (ML) solutions for source spectra and noise variances in terms of the source locations allow these parameters to be sampled implicitly, substantially reducing the dimensionality of the inversion. Source sampling, addition, and deletion are based on joint conditional probability distributions for source range and depth, which incorporate the ML spectral estimates. Computing these conditionals requires solving a very large number of systems of equations, which is carried out in parallel on a GPU, improving efficiency by 2 orders of magnitude. Simulated examples illustrate localizations and spectral estimation for a large number of sources (up to eight), and investigate mitigation of environmental mismatch via efficient multiple-frequency inversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207