Constructing and evaluating a nursing capstone course for cultivating creativity in RN-BSN students in Taiwan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to construct and evaluate a nursing capstone course designed to cultivate creativity in RN-BSN students. The pre-post study design was used in a one-group of RN-BSN students who enrolled in a nursing capstone course. This pilot study was conducted under the auspices of NSC research grant 101-2511-S- 242-002, IRB protocol number FYH-IRB-101-07-01-A. The nursing capstone project course lasted for 18 weeks was taught for 2 hr /week, and involved 6 mainstream methods, and 5 major assessment criteria. The 8 RN-BSN students’ self-perceived abilities of creativity in this pilot study showed statistically significant improvement after completing the nursing capstone project course ( p < .01), but their characteristics, abilities, and motivation for creativity were unaffected. However, the measured barriers to creativity among 8 RN-BSN students decreased substantially from the pre-to the post test ( p < .05). Moreover, 9 RN-BSN students provided positive feedbacks about their learning experiences. Finally, the 9 RN-BSN students in the nursing capstone project course were developed two nursing products named as Anti-Needlestick Treasure Box and Comfortable Catheter Stickers, which have participated in the creative competition activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".