Comparison of the symbiotic and competition phenotypes of<i>Sinorhizobium meliloti</i>PHB synthesis and degradation pathway mutants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The competitive abilities of Sinorhizobium meliloti mutant strains containing lesions in the PHB synthesis (phbC) and degradation (bdhA) pathways were compared. While the bdhA mutant showed no noticeable symbiotic defects on alfalfa host plants when inoculated alone, in mixed inoculation experiments it was found to be less competitive than the wild type for nodule occupancy. Long-term survival of the bdhA mutant on a carbon-limiting medium was not affected. However, when subjected to competition with the wild-type strain in periodic subculturing through alternating carbon-limiting and carbon-excess conditions, the bdhA mutant performed poorly. A more severe defect in competition for growth and nodule occupancy was observed with a mutant unable to synthesize PHB (phbC). These results indicate that the ability to efficiently deposit cellular PHB stores is a key factor influencing competitive survival under conditions of fluctuating nutrient carbon availability, whereas the ability to use these stores is less important.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".