MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171097847 · doi:10.1093/jjco/hyf068

Mutation and Expression of the beta-Catenin-interacting Protein ICAT in Human Colorectal Tumors

2002· article· en· W2171097847 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Takatoshi Koyama

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
KeywordsWnt signaling pathwayCancer researchAdenomatous polyposis coliColorectal cancerBeta-cateninBiologyTumor suppressor geneMolecular biologyGeneCarcinogenesisMedicineGeneticsCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of Wnt signaling caused by mutations in the tumor suppressor adenomatous polyposis coli or beta-catenin is a critical event in the development of human colorectal tumors. We have recently identified the ICAT gene, which encodes a small protein that interacts with beta-catenin and represses Wnt signaling. METHODS: We examined the prevalence of mutations in the entire ICAT coding sequence and intronic splice donor and acceptor regions of ICAT by PCR-SSCP and also the expression of the ICAT gene by RT-PCR. RESULTS: The ICAT gene was mapped to chromosome 1p36.1-p36.2, which is implicated in the pathogenesis of various types of cancers. However, no mutations in ICAT were detected among 128 colorectal tumors. Instead, ICAT was found to be overexpressed in almost half of colorectal carcinomas. Cases exhibiting ICAT overexpression showed a significantly higher incidence of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and positive lymphatic permeation. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that ICAT is not the putative tumor suppressor on 1p36.1-p36.2, although aberrant overexpression of ICAT may play a role in the pathogenesis of colorectal carcinomas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Clinical OncologySame topicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerFrench-language works237,207