MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2171144763 · doi:10.1164/rccm.2406001

E. J. Moran Campbell, 1925–2004

2004· article· en· W2171144763 on OpenAlexaff
Norman L. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBattleWork of breathingGerontologyRespiratory systemInternal medicineHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. Moran Campbell, Founding Chairman of Medicine at McMaster University, 1968–1975, died on April 12, 2004, after a long battle with colon cancer. He was an outstanding scientist, physician, and educator, achieving a worldwide reputation as the foremost clinical respiratory physiologist of his generation. He changed how respiratory medicine was taught and practiced. Moran was born in 1925, the son of a Yorkshire general practitioner. In 1950 he obtained his medical degree at the Middlesex Hospital Medical School in London, and shortly after began research in the Department of Physiology at the same institution. He used the new technique of electromyography, together with pressure and volume measurements to provide the first comprehensive description of the mechanical events during breathing and the neural mechanisms that control the respiratory muscles. His book The Respiratory Muscles and the Mechanics of Breathing (1958) remains the seminal work on these topics. In it Moran developed a diagram (universally known as the Campbell diagram) that remains the standard tool for partitioning work of breathing. After a year at the Johns Hopkins University with Dr. Richard Riley, the foremost researcher in pulmonary gas exchange, Moran returned to London in the late 1950s. He applied the new techniques for measurement of blood oxygen and carbon dioxide pressures to patients with respiratory failure. He documented their blood gas derangements and formulated a new approach to treatment. Central to this approach was the careful control of inspired oxygen concentration to avoid carbon dioxide retention. Both the measurement of carbon dioxide pressure and the administration of small but precise increases in oxygen concentration presented obstacles, but Moran developed novel techniques to overcome them. To achieve precise increases in inspired oxygen concentration, he developed a mask into which a jet of pure oxygen was delivered using a precisely machined nozzle; this led to a reduction in pressure surrounding the jet (the Venturi effect), which thereby drew in room air through holes in the neck of the mask, precisely diluting the oxygen to achieve a small increase in concentration. The “Ventimask” has remained the standard of care ever since, and the approach received worldwide acceptance, and doubtless profited the manufacturer to an incomparably greater extent than the inventor (the only remuneration he ever received from the manufacturer was a free briefcase). He summarized his new ideas when he delivered the Burns Amberson Lecture at the Annual Meeting of the American Thoracic Society in 1967. The principles enunciated in this published lecture (Am Rev Respir Dis 1967;96:626–639) remain the cornerstones of care in respiratory failure. During the late 1950s, Moran became intrigued by breathlessness. He began with a series of studies in which breathing was impeded in healthy subjects by elastic and resistive loads. With Dr. Jack Howell he developed a theory of length/tension inappropriateness, which was based on a complex understanding

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→