MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171175065 · doi:10.1016/s0895-7061(02)02421-4

The selective aldosterone blocker eplerenone is safe and efficacious for the long-term treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension

2002· article· en· W2171175065 on OpenAlexaff
Ellen Burgess

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Hypertension · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEplerenoneMedicineTolerabilityAldosteroneInternal medicineSpironolactoneUrologyBlood pressureHeart failureCardiologyEndocrinologyAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eplerenone (EPL), the first selective aldosterone blocker (SAB), binds preferentially to aldosterone receptors, with little affinity for progesterone or androgen receptors. EPL is to be used for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. This 6- to 16-month, open-label, single-group, titration-to-effect study assessed the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of EPL in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Patients (n=586) with DBP ≥90 mmHg and <110 mmHg, or SBP ≥140 mmHg and <180 mmHg, received EPL 50 mg QD. If BP was uncontrolled at Weeks 2 or 4 (DBP ≥90 mmHg or SBP ≥140 mmHg), EPL was up-titrated to 100 mg QD and, if necessary, 200 mg QD. If BP remained uncontrolled at any time from Week 6 to the end of Month 3, a second antihypertensive medication of the investigator's choice was added. Safety, tolerability, and BP were assessed at protocol-specified times. The proportions of patients reporting treatment-emergent AEs for which a relationship to the study medication was considered “uncertain” or “probable” were 21.5% and 8.4%, respectively. Impotence, gynecomastia, and menstrual abnormalities were noted in 3.0%, 0.7%, and 2.5% of patients, respectively, but the majority of these events were considered to be of uncertain or no relationship to study medication. Elevated K+ levels were noted in 2.4% of patients, primarily those receiving EPL 200 mg. The mean change from baseline SBP/DBP was −15.9/−10.6 in patients whose final dose level was EPL 50 mg (N=68); −18.1/−12.2 for EPL 100 mg (N=89); −19.1/−12.5 for EPL 200 mg (N=104); and −24.9/−14.6 for EPL 200 mg plus add-on therapy (N=172). A total of 433 patients (74.3%) were classified as responders (DBP <90mmHg or ≥10 mmHg from baseline), and 261 patients (44.8%) responded to EPL monotherapy. The incidence of withdrawal due to treatment failure at or after Month 4 was 4.8%. In conclusion, long-term treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with the SAB eplerenone was safe and efficacious when used as a monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive medications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of HypertensionSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207