Late (> 48 hr) myocardial infarction after PTCA: Clinical and angiographic characteristics of infarction related or not to the angioplasty site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since late myocardial infarctions after percutaneous coronary interventions have not been well characterized, we intended to evaluate the characteristics of myocardial infarctions occurring > 48 hr after balloon angioplasty of native coronary arteries or saphenous vein grafts. The Montreal Heart Institute database (1985-1996) was interrogated for all patients readmitted with a diagnosis of MI more than 48 hr after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). We compared the clinical, procedural, and angiographic variables between MIs related or not to the index PTCA site. One hundred and ninety-three patients presented with late myocardial infarction (MI) following balloon angioplasty. The median time elapsed between PTCA and MI was 55 days compared to 968 days when MI was unrelated to the PTCA site. MIs related to the PTCA site were more likely non-Q-wave (76% vs. 35%, P = 0.0001) with less marked CK-MB rise. Angiography showed less complex lesions (63% vs. 90%, P = 0.001) and better thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade flow (TIMI II to III, 66% vs. 56%, P = 0.01) when the culprit lesion was at the PTCA site. Independent predictors of MI at the PTCA site were vein graft dilation, female sex, and residual stenosis post-PTCA. Myocardial infarctions occurring late after PTCA have a distinct time course and present specific characteristics according to their relationship or not to the previously dilated site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".