MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171306911 · doi:10.5430/jbgc.v5n1p20

Aberrant supra-diaphragmatic renal artery

2014· article· en· W2171306911 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Muhammed Hatem, Robin R. Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal and Vascular Pathologies
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRenal arteryRenal hilumAngiographyRadiologyDiaphragm (acoustics)KidneyAnatomyDiaphragmatic breathingRight Renal ArteryHilum (anatomy)Lumbar arteriesNephrectomyLumbarInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a rare case of aberrant supra-diaphragmatic renal artery originates at the level of T12 piercing the right hemi diaphragm and entering the hilum of the right kidney. Variations in renal arteries are quite common, and it is very important for renal interventionists to have a good knowledge about the possibility of anatomical variations in renal arteries. The most common reported variations are early division and accessory vessels, however, other rare variations like higher origin of renal arteries, as reported in this case report, should also be taken in consideration. The importance of these variations arise from the increase number of renal interventional procedures performed by interventional radiologists, urologists and general surgeons; in interventional radiology it is very important to know the possibility of higher origin renal artery in order to cover this vessel when performing conventional angiography. It is also important for urologists when performing renal transplant. The embryology of renal arteries dictates the possibility of these variations; theoretically, renal arteries can arise from the aorta along the whole length of rete arteriosum urogenitale which extends from cervical 6th to lumbar 3rd vertebra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Graphics and ComputingSame topicRenal and Vascular PathologiesFrench-language works237,207