Bypassing Orthogonal Relaying Transmissions via Spatial Signal Separation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We argue for incorporating Space Division Multiple Access (SDMA) into cooperative relaying, in order to bypass orthogonal relaying transmissions and thus achieve diversity gain without any cost on the available degrees of freedom. In particular, we propose a cooperative relaying scheme that utilizes two single-antenna relays and multiple antennas at the destination terminal, in order to spatially separate the concurrently arriving signals. The whole concept is based upon two key elements: a) To combat the half-duplex constraint by having two relays transmitting alternatively, i.e., the one receiving while the other transmitting and vice versa, and b) to spatially separate the signals arriving concurrently at the destination using the well-known optimum combining technique. Closed-form expressions for the average capacity and outage probability are provided. Numerical results manifest that the proposed model outperforms orthogonal relaying as well as distributed space-time coding in terms of average capacity and outage probability, owing to the former's advantage of higher spectral efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".