A description of manual wheelchair skills training curriculum in entry-to-practice occupational and physical therapy programs in Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the curriculum for manual wheelchair (MWC) skills training in entry-to-practice occupational (OT) and physical therapy (PT) programs in Canada. METHODS: An online survey was sent to 28 directors of entry-to-practice OT and PT programs in Canadian universities. Responses were solicited from individuals who could report about wheelchair skills training. Fourteen survey questions asked about: (1) demographic information, (2) specific curriculum content for MWC skills training, (3) teaching methods used, (4) instructional methods and estimated time used to teach MWC skills and (5) whether validated wheelchair skills training programs were used in curriculum development. RESULTS: Responses received from 21/28 programs, (OT-11/14; PT-10/14). About 16 of 21 programs included curriculum for MWC skills training. Informal hands-on instruction was the most common method used for teaching wheelchair skills (13/21), while multiple lectures were used the least (5/21). Only 8/21 used a validated wheelchair skills training program in curriculum development. CONCLUSION: Despite the public availability of a validated wheelchair skills program, there is little use of the program in entry-to-practice curriculum. Integrating online training programs into existing curricula or the development of post-professional training modules may help clinicians to better accommodate the mobility needs of the substantially increasing population with disabilities. Implications for Rehabilitation Current clinical curriculum includes basic wheelchair skills training, but not necessarily training in the advanced wheelchair skills that are needed for optimal wheelchair mobility. There is evidence for a standardized approach for providing wheelchair skills training, that may be administered through curriculum, online or through post-graduate training modules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it