MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Benthic macroinvertebrate biomass and wildfires: evidence for enrichment of boreal subarctic lakes

2001· article· en· W2171506886 on OpenAlexaffabout
Garry J. Scrimgeour, William M. Tonn, Cynthia A. Paszkowski, Cameron P. Goater

Bibliographic record

VenueFreshwater Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeUniversity of AlbertaARC Resources (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenthic zoneChironomidaeBiomass (ecology)Subarctic climateLittoral zoneEnvironmental scienceBenthosProfundal zoneEcologyBorealLake ecosystemNutrientChlorophyll aEcosystemBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 We quantified the effects of forest fire on littoral benthic macroinvertebrate biomass on a boreal subarctic plateau in Alberta, Canada. Water chemistry and benthos were collected from six lakes, 1 and 2 years following a 1995 fire which burned about 91% of their catchments (i.e. recently burnt lakes), and from four other lakes whose catchments burned between 1961 and 1985 (i.e. previously burnt lakes). Seven lakes whose catchments had not burned since at least 1957 served as reference systems. 2 Total benthic macroinvertebrate biomass and biomass of Chironomidae were 1.5‐ and 2‐fold ( P <0.05) greater within recently burnt lakes than in reference systems, whereas the biomass of Oligochaeta ( P =0.06) and Amphipoda ( P =0.07) were marginally higher in burnt than reference lakes. Burnt lakes had greater colour ( P< 0.05) and marginally ( P =0.06) higher concentrations of soluble reactive phosphorus than reference lakes. 3 Nutrient diffusing substrata deployed in a previously and a recently burnt lake indicated that littoral epilithic communities were co‐limited by the availability of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N), although co‐limitation was stronger in the previously burnt than the recently burnt lake. Epilithic chlorophyll a on natural stone surfaces in the recently burnt lake was also 3.5 times higher ( P <0.05) than that from the previously burnt lake. 4 Among all 17 lakes, total benthic biomass and biomass of Chironomidae, Amphipoda and Nematoda, were significantly ( P <0.05) or marginally ( P= 0.06) related to soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) but not dissolved inorganic nitrogen or colour. These regressions explained between 11% and 64% of variation in benthic biomasses. 5 Linear regressions and second‐order polynomials explained 18% and 24% of the variation in concentrations of SRP and water colour with time since fire, respectively, and between 22% and 70% of variation in total biomass and biomass of the five dominant invertebrate groups. These analyses suggest that benthic biomasses continue to be elevated for about 15–20 years following fire before declining to pre‐disturbance levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFreshwater BiologySame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207