MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Brassinin oxidase, a fungal detoxifying enzyme to overcome a plant defense – purification, characterization and inhibition

2008· article· en· W2171515495 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Soledade C. Pedras, Zoran Minić, Mukund Jha

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsLeptosphaeria maculansCruciferPhytoalexinBlacklegBiologyBiochemistryFlavoproteinEnzymeBotanyBrassicaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blackleg fungi [Leptosphaeria maculans (asexual stage Phoma lingam) and Leptosphaeria biglobosa] are devastating plant pathogens with well-established stratagems to invade crucifers, including the production of enzymes that detoxify plant defenses such as phytoalexins. The significant roles of brassinin, both as a potent crucifer phytoalexin and a biosynthetic precursor of several other plant defenses, make it critical to plant fitness. Brassinin oxidase, a detoxifying enzyme produced by L. maculans both in vitro and in planta, catalyzes the detoxification of brassinin by the unusual oxidative transformation of a dithiocarbamate to an aldehyde. Purified brassinin oxidase has an apparent molecular mass of 57 kDa, is approximately 20% glycosylated, and accepts a wide range of cofactors, including quinones and flavins. Purified brassinin oxidase was used to screen a library of brassinin analogues and crucifer phytoalexins for potential inhibitory activity. Unexpectedly, it was determined that the crucifer phytoalexins camalexin and cyclobrassinin are competitive inhibitors of brassinin oxidase. This discovery suggests that camalexin could protect crucifers from attacks by L. maculans because camalexin is not metabolized by this pathogen and is a strong mycelial growth inhibitor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS JournalSame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207