MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171633208 · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.65690-0

Marinobacter psychrophilus sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from the Arctic

2008· article· en· W2171633208 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dahai Zhang, H.-R. Li, Xin Yi, Zhe Chi, Ping Zhou, Yan Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyPsychrophile16S ribosomal RNAPhylogenetic treeBacteriaStrain (injury)genomic DNAMicrobiologyRibosomal RNAGeneGeneticsAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strain 20041(T) was isolated from sea-ice of the Canadian Basin (7 degrees 23' 14'' N 14 degrees 06' 55'' W). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene homology showed that strain 20041(T) was related to members of the genus Marinobacter and had highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with the type strain of Marinobacter maritimus. Cells were Gram-negative, rod-shaped, psychrophilic and motile. The temperature range for growth was 0-22 degrees C, with optimum growth occurring at 16-18 degrees C and at approximately pH 6.0-9.0. Strain 20041(T) had ubiquinone-9 as the major respiratory quinone and iso-C(15 : 0) 2OH and/or C(16 : 1)omega7c, C(16 : 0), C(18 : 1)omega9c and C(12 : 0) 3OH as major fatty acids. The genomic DNA G+C content was 55.4 mol%. On the basis of the phenotypic characteristics, phylogenetic analysis and DNA-DNA relatedness data, strain 20041(T) is considered to represent a novel species, for which the name Marinobacter psychrophilus sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is 20041(T) (=CGMCC 1.6499(T)=JCM 14643(T)).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGYSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207