CYP2A5 Induction and Hepatocellular Stress: An Adaptive Response to Perturbations of Heme Homeostasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unlike most cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, murine hepatic CYP2A5 is induced during pathological conditions that result in liver injury including hepatotoxicity mediated by xenobiotics, hepatitis caused by various microbial agents and liver neoplasia. Since CYP2A5 metabolizes various important xenobiotics including nicotine and pro-carcinogens such as nitrosamines and aflatoxin B(1), altered gene expression could affect tobacco addiction, hepatotoxicity and hepatocarcinogenesis. This article synthesizes the current knowledge concerning hepatic expression of Cyp2a5 including the transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms, pathophysiological conditions associated with enzyme induction such as oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress and altered lipid and energy homeostasis as well as the known exogenous and putative endogenous substrates. Knowledge of the stimuli responsible for the unique overexpression of CYP2A5 during liver injury may provide clues to a functional role for this enzyme and the impact of variable CYP2A5 expression on xenobiotic metabolism and toxicity, disease development and the adaptive response to hepatocellular stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".