MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171797786 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2009.2018576

Spin-Polarized Current Switching of Co/Cu/Py Elongated Pac-Man Spin-Valve

2009· article· en· W2171797786 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Lyle, Yang‐Ki Hong, Byoung-Chul Choi, Gavin S. Abo, Mun-Hyoun Park, S. H. Gee, Jeevan Jalli, Seok Bae, G.W. Donohoe

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersAir Force Research Laboratory
KeywordsAntiparallel (mathematics)Aspect ratio (aeronautics)Materials scienceAntiferromagnetismSpin valveSpin (aerodynamics)Current densityCurrent (fluid)PicosecondPulse durationVortexCondensed matter physicsContrast ratioOptoelectronicsOpticsMagnetic fieldPhysicsMagnetizationLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated spin-polarized current switching of elongated Pac-man (EPM) elements in a Pac-man shaped spin valve (Co/Cu/Py). The aspect ratio, pulse duration, and effect of antiferromagnetic (AFM) layer were simulated to obtain coherent switching. Pulse duration was varied on the picosecond (ps) scale and showed that ultra-fast switching could be achieved. A critical aspect ratio of 4.2 was found, where a minimum current density was observed. For antiparallel to parallel (AP-P) switching, a vortex formed during the switching process for aspect ratios less than 7. Aspect ratios of 7 or higher did not form a vortex and showed similar current densities to parallel to antiparallel (P-AP) switching as a result. It was found that the AFM layer prevented the formation of a vortex at the critical aspect ratio of 4.2 and effectively changed the switching mechanism. This allowed coherent switching with current densities for AP-P and P-AP to be only 7% from each other at the aspect ratio of 4.2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207