MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171823353 · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-218

Alternative Imaging Modalities in Ischemic Heart Failure (AIMI-HF) IMAGE HF Project I-A: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2013· article· en· W2171823353 on OpenAlexafffund
Eileen O’Meara, Lisa Mielniczuk, George A. Wells, Robert A. deKemp, Ran Klein, Doug Coyle, Brian Mc Ardle, D. Ian Paterson, James A. White, Malcolm Arnold, Matthias G. Friedrich, Éric Larose, Alexander Dick, Benjamin J.W. Chow, Carole Dennie, Haissam Haddad, Terrence D. Ruddy, Heikki Ukkonen, Gerald Wisenberg, Bernard Cantin, Philippe Pîbarot, Michael R. Freeman, Éric Turcotte, Kim A. Connelly, J Clarke, Kathryn Williams, Normand Racine, Linda Garrard, Jean‐Claude Tardif, Jean DaSilva, Juhani Knuuti, Rob Beanlands

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityOttawa HospitalHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreSt. Michael's HospitalUniversité de SherbrookeLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of AlbertaUniversité du QuébecWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of OttawaMontreal Heart Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of OttawaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureRandomized controlled trialRevascularizationClinical endpointMyocardial infarctionIschemic cardiomyopathyCardiac magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance imagingCardiologyModalitiesClinical trialEjection fractionRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the most common cause of heart failure (HF); however, the role of revascularization in these patients is still unclear. Consensus on proper use of cardiac imaging to help determine which candidates should be considered for revascularization has been hindered by the absence of clinical studies that objectively and prospectively compare the prognostic information of each test obtained using both standard and advanced imaging. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper describes the design and methods to be used in the Alternative Imaging Modalities in Ischemic Heart Failure (AIMI-HF) multi-center trial. The primary objective is to compare the effect of HF imaging strategies on the composite clinical endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrest and re-hospitalization for cardiac causes.In AIMI-HF, patients with HF of ischemic etiology (n = 1,261) will follow HF imaging strategy algorithms according to the question(s) asked by the physicians (for example, Is there ischemia and/or viability?), in agreement with local practices. Patients will be randomized to either standard (SPECT, Single photon emission computed tomography) imaging modalities for ischemia and/or viability or advanced imaging modalities: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) or positron emission tomography (PET). In addition, eligible and consenting patients who could not be randomized, but were allocated to standard or advanced imaging based on clinical decisions, will be included in a registry. DISCUSSION: AIMI-HF will be the largest randomized trial evaluating the role of standard and advanced imaging modalities in the management of ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure. This trial will complement the results of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) viability substudy and the PET and Recovery Following Revascularization (PARR-2) trial. The results will provide policy makers with data to support (or not) further investment in and wider dissemination of alternative 'advanced' imaging technologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01288560.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207