MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171848916 · doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.02.014

Preoperative statin use and in-hospital outcomes following heart surgery in patients with unstable angina

2005· article· en· W2171848916 on OpenAlexaff
Imran Ali, Karen J. Buth

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUnstable anginaStatinAnginaCardiologyInternal medicineEmergency medicineCoronary heart diseaseMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Unstable angina (UA) is characterized by a state of coronary artery vascular inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Statins mitigate inflammation and endothelial dysfunction and decrease mortality associated with percutaneous interventions for UA. We determined whether preoperative statin use is associated with decreased mortality and morbidity following coronary artery bypass+/-valve surgery for UA. METHODS: Patients with CCS Class IV angina having CABG+/-valve surgery were identified (n=1706). A logistic regression model determined the association of preoperative statin use with in-hospital mortality (IHM). Propensity score analysis was used to match two sub-groups of patients (GrpI, on statins, n=534; GrpII, not on statins, n=534) on factors known to affect outcomes. Outcomes were IHM, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use, perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI), prolonged (>24 h) ventilation (p-vent), stroke, and a composite outcome (comp) defined as any one or more of the above. RESULTS: Of the 1706 patients, 1075 were on statins and 631 were not. Patients on statins were more likely to have isolated CABG, EF>40%, and be on a beta-blocker (P=0.0001); and less likely to have renal failure, MI<7 days, CHF, and undergoing urgent/emergent surgery (P=0.0001). Unadjusted rates of IHM (9 vs. 5%, P=0.001), stroke (4.4 vs. 2.3%, P=0.015), p-vent (28.4 vs. 19%, P=0.0001), and comp (32.5 vs. 22.8%, P=0.0001) were lower in patients receiving statins. After adjustment, statin use was not associated with a reduction in IHM (OR=1.0, 95% CI=0.6-1.5, P=0.85) or comp (OR=1.1, 95% CI=0.8-1.4, P=0.69). No significant differences were found in any of the propensity-adjusted outcomes for GrpI vs. GrpII: IHM (7.1 vs. 6.4%), PMI (2.8 vs. 1.7%), IABP use (3 vs. 3.8%), stroke (3.8 vs. 3.9%), p-vent (26.4 vs. 23.8%), comp (31.5 vs. 27.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative statin use is not associated with a reduction in IHM or major morbidity following CABG+/-valve surgery in patients with UA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207