Proteinase-activated receptors 1 and 4 counter-regulate endostatin and VEGF release from human platelets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The roles of proteinase-activated receptors (PARs) in platelet functions other than aggregation are not well understood. Among these is the release of factors that regulate the process of angiogenesis, such as endostatin and VEGF, which, respectively, inhibit and promote angiogenesis. PAR1 and PAR4 are expressed on the surface of human platelets and can be activated by thrombin. In the present study, we have attempted to determine the roles of PAR1 and PAR4 in regulating release of endostatin and VEGF from human platelets. Aggregation and endostatin release could be elicited by a specific PAR4 agonist (AYPGKF-NH(2)). The PAR4 agonist concentration dependently suppressed VEGF release. A selective PAR1 agonist (TFLLR-NH(2)) induced platelet aggregation and VEGF release but suppressed endostatin release. Thrombin did not affect endostatin or VEGF release. However, in the presence of a selective PAR1 antagonist (SCH79797), thrombin stimulated endostatin release and suppressed VEGF release. Conversely, in the presence of a selective PAR4 antagonist (transcinnamoyl-YPGKF-NH(2)), thrombin stimulated VEGF release. In vivo, treatment of rats with established gastric ulcers with a PAR1 antagonist each day for 1 wk resulted in a significant retardation of healing. We conclude that PAR1 and PAR4 counter-regulate the release of endostatin and VEGF from platelets. These protease-activated receptors could therefore play a crucial role in regulating angiogenesis and in turn could regulate the processes of wound healing and tumor growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it