Lapping of Costal Cartilage Technique: A Key Step in Stabilizing and Reducing the Bulk of Costal Cartilage Used in Rhinoplasty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rhinoplasty is an art of not only achieving structural integrity of nasal form but also maintaining functional aspects of breathing.To achieve this, autograft, allograft, and synthetic materials are used as various components of nasal structure for augmentation or correction. 1,2Despite various synthetic materials giving promising results and compatibility, cartilage grafting remains the most reliable method.East Asian populations have short, flat noses with weak, insufficient cartilage. 3Therefore, costal cartilage is the best option for repair.Although costal cartilage is good for such cases, an adequate fixing technique will make it more reliable.In the present study, one of us (D.-H.J.) adapted a technique that is commonly used by carpenters to stabilize a joint without affecting the thickness of wooden blocks, termed half-lap joints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it