MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172074080 · doi:10.1139/v08-105

Alkyne adducts of paramagnetic and diamagnetic tripalladium clusters supported by dppm ligands

2008· article· en· W2172074080 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Cyril Cugnet, Sophie Dal Molin, David Brevet, Dominique Lucas, Yves Mugnier, Pierre D. Harvey, Renè T. Boeré

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryAlkyneDicationAdductComproportionationElectron paramagnetic resonanceCyclic voltammetryCrystallographyRedoxDiphenylacetyleneRadicalElectrochemistryPhotochemistryMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryMoleculeNuclear magnetic resonanceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unsaturated redox-active cluster [Pd3(dppm)3(CO)]n+ (n = 0,1, or 2) reacts with ethylene dicarboxylic esters and a variety of terminal acetylenes (but not PhC≡CPh) in all three charge states. In particular, the radical cations [Pd3(dppm)3(CO)(RC≡CR′)].+ can be produced by several routes: one-electron electrochemical reduction of the dication adducts, comproportionation of the neutral and dicationic adducts, as well as the direct complexation of alkyne to the known radical cation [Pd3(dppm)3(CO)].+. Compared with the latter, each of the adducts have significantly extended lifetimes and classify as persistent radicals in solution. The alkyne adducts have been characterized by voltammetry (cyclic and rotating disk electrode), by UV – vis titrations and by MALDI-TOF mass spectra from dithranol matrices. Isotropic solution EPR spectra of the adducts with R = R′ = MeOC(O) and EtOC(O), as well as those with R′ = H and R = C6H5, FC6H4, HC≡CC6H4, and EtO have been obtained. Full line shape fitting simulations demonstrate that all display coupling to six different 31P (I = 1/2) and to one to three 106Pd (I = 5/2) nuclei. The A(31P) values range from a low of 3.0 × 104 to a high of 180.5 × 104 cm–1; this variation is caused by changes in the contribution of P s orbitals to the SOMO resulting from structural distortions of the Pd3P6 core upon alkyne coordination.Key words: electrochemistry, redox state, electron paramagnetic resonance, catalytic model, palladium, bridging phosphine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207