MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172100526 · doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm097

Space-time variability of carbon standing stocks and fixation rates in the Gulf of Maine, along the GNATS transect between Portland, ME, USA, and Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada

2007· article· en· W2172100526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William M. Balch, David T. Drapeau, Bruce C. Bowler, E. S. Booth, Laura A. Windecker, Amanda Ashe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plankton Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplanktonPhotic zoneOceanographyTransectEnvironmental scienceGeologyNutrientEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gulf of Maine North Atlantic Time Series has been run since 1998 and is the longest transect time series in the Gulf of Maine (GoM), USA. Here we use this coastal time series to document the space–time variability of hydrography, nutrients, phytoplankton standing stocks and carbon fixation in the GoM, in response to several years of extreme river discharge. We hypothesize that, during wet years, fresh water input capped the surface euphotic layer, impeding the upward diffusion of nutrients, thus lowering the phytoplankton biomass and carbon fixation rates. Regional algorithms were derived to estimate particulate organic carbon and carbon fixation. The Howard–Yoder algorithm was implemented to predict integral primary production using satellite ocean color data. Calcification was significantly correlated to primary production, thus allowing regional, satellite-derived calcification estimates. Total GoM and Georges Bank phytoplankton photosynthesis was 38.12 Tg C year−1 and total calcification was 0.55 Tg C year−1, yielding an overall ratio of calcification to photosynthesis of 1.44%. Carbon fixation in GoM coastal water (<60 m bottom depth), GoM deep water (>60 m) and Georges Bank waters (<60 m) averaged 33, 56 and 11% of the total primary production of the combined GoM and Georges Bank study area, respectively, and 22, 67 and 11% of the total calcification of the study area, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plankton ResearchSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207