The amylose extender mutant of maize conditions novel protein-protein interactions between starch biosynthetic enzymes in amyloplasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The amylose extender (ae(-)) mutant of maize lacks starch branching enzyme IIb (SBEIIb) activity, resulting in amylopectin with reduced branch point frequency, and longer glucan chains. Recent studies indicate isozymes of soluble starch synthases form high molecular weight complexes with SBEII isoforms. This study investigated the effect of the loss of SBEIIb activity on interactions between starch biosynthetic enzymes in maize endosperm amyloplasts. Results show distinct patterns of protein-protein interactions in amyloplasts of ae(-) mutants compared with the wild type, suggesting functional complementation for loss of SBEIIb by SBEI, SBEIIa, and SP. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments and affinity chromatography using recombinant proteins showed that, in amyloplasts from normal endosperm, protein-protein interactions involving starch synthase I (SSI), SSIIa, and SBEIIb could be detected. By contrast, in ae(-) amyloplasts, SSI and SSIIa interacted with SBEI, SBEIIa, and SP. All interactions in the wild-type were strongly enhanced by ATP, and broken by alkaline phosphatase, indicating a role for protein phosphorylation in their assembly. Whilst ATP and alkaline phosphatase had no effect on the stability of the protein complexes from ae(-) endosperm, radiolabelling experiments showed SP and SBEI were both phosphorylated within the mutant protein complex. It is proposed that, during amylopectin biosynthesis, SSI and SSIIa form the core of a phosphorylation-dependent glucan-synthesizing protein complex which, in normal endosperm, recruits SBEIIb, but when SBEIIb is absent (ae(-)), recruits SBEI, SBEIIa, and SP. Differences in stromal protein complexes are mirrored in the complement of the starch synthesizing enzymes detected in the starch granules of each genotype, reinforcing the hypothesis that the complexes play a functional role in starch biosynthesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".