MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metal‐Dependent Polysaccharide Deacetylase <scp>PgaB</scp>

2014· other· en· W2172295996 on OpenAlexaff
Dustin J. Little, Natalie C. Bamford, Mark Nitz, P. Lynne Howell

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcetylationChemistryEscherichia coliBiochemistryPolysaccharideGlycoside hydrolaseActive siteBiofilmHydrolysisEnzymeStereochemistryBacteriaBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract PgaB is a two‐domain protein responsible for the de‐ N ‐acetylation of poly(β‐1,6‐ N ‐acetyl‐ d ‐glucosamine) ( PNAG ). Many bacteria use deacetylated PNAG ( dPNAG ) as a key extracellular matrix component. De‐ N ‐acetylation is a required modification for polymer export and biofilm formation in Escherichia coli . The N‐terminal domain adopts a (β/α) 7 fold common to the CAZy family‐4 carbohydrate esterases, and exhibits low levels of de‐ N ‐acetylation activity on PNAG oligomers. The de‐ N ‐acetylase active site contains an Asp‐His‐His metal coordination site that can bind various divalent metal cations but has optimal activity with Co 2+ , Ni 2+ , and Fe 2+ . The C‐terminal domain of PgaB adopts a (β/α) 8 fold that is structurally similar to glycoside hydrolases. This domain is proposed to bind PNAG as attempts to display hydrolytic activity have been unsuccessful, but the domain is required for de‐ N ‐acetylation in vivo. Here, we summarize recent advances in the functional characterization of PgaB: the structure, metal specificity, and progress toward inhibitor design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic ChemistrySame topicEnzyme Production and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207