The relationship between daytime experiences and nighttime marital behaviour ; Spillover of daytime emotions on marital interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review outlines literature on the influence of daytime experiences on nighttime marital behaviour. Researchers propose that experiences at work and home spillover into and influence the other domain. Factors affecting spillover included gender, job characteristics, role satisfaction, negative affect and marital satisfaction. Outcomes of spillover included withdrawn and angry marital behaviour. Results of the current research suggest that husbands tend to withdraw, whilst wives tend to display anger during marital interactions following a negatively arousing day. Individual differences and situational theories have been proposed to explain this gender difference. Limitations ofthe studies include the focus on married individuals living in the United States and Canada. Research has also focused on the spillover of husbands' workday experiences. Future research needs to be conducted on couples in other countries and to explore other influences that may impact on spillover. Future research should aim to develop a clear empirical model for understanding the processes by which daytime experiences influence nighttime marital behaviour.This study examines the relationship between negative affect at the end of the day and nighttime marital behaviour (angry and withdrawn). The study explores the influence of gender and marital satisfaction of this relationship. Fifty couples completed Negative Affectivity Scale (NAS; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) at the end of their day and Angry and Withdrawn Marital Behaviour Scales (AMBS and WMBS; Schulz, Cowan, Cowan, & Brennan, 2004) before going to bed. Couples provided information on their marital satisfaction through completion ofthe Marital Adjustment Test (MAT; Locke & Wallace, 1959). Independent T tests found a significant difference between husbands' and wives' average nighttime levels of angry and withdrawn marital behaviour. Multiple regression analyses found a relationship between negative affect at the end of the day and nightly marital behaviour. Marital satisfaction was found to influence the relationship between negative affect at the end of the day and nighttime withdrawn behaviour, but not the relationship between negative affect at the end of the day and angry marital behaviour. The study adds important knowledge on gender differences in marital behaviour and spillover processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".