Systemic Production of Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Nonhuman Primates by Transplantation of Genetically Modified Myoblasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical use of human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (hG-CSF) to treat various diseases involving neutropenia has been previously shown to (1) successfully increase circulating neutrophils, (2) reduce condition-related infections, and (3) cause few side effects in patients. To alleviate the symptoms of neutropenia, the patient must receive frequent injections of recombinant hG-CSF. Permanent ways to deliver stable levels of the molecule to the patient are being investigated. Among them, the transplantation of hG-CSF-secreting cells has been proposed and performed successfully in rodents, using fibroblast cell lines and primary muscle cells. We thus investigated whether similar results could be obtained by intramuscular myoblast transplantation in a large animal model. When 1-3 x 10(8) myoblasts were injected into three Macaca mulatta, hG-CSF was detected at high levels (300-900 pg/ml), which in turn led to a four- to fivefold increase in circulating neutrophils. However, both the concentrations of hG-CSF and neutrophil levels were found to decrease over time. Nonetheless, neutrophils were found at higher levels from the fourth week until the end the experiment (up to 29 weeks) in G-CSF monkeys compared with control animals. These results show that transplantation of hG-CSF-secreting myoblasts may indeed be a therapeutic option for the treatment of neutropenic patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".